intrigeri:
> Meanwhile, segfault suggested something on #11052: bring back the
> behaviour we had before 3.13.2, that is, if the Tails device is
> unplugged while the system is sleeping, and still unplugged when the
> system is woken up, then emergency shutdown is triggered.

Oh yeah, we should have this back!

>> I'm not saying this to discard the idea of giving the choice but to
>> contrast it with the potential cost of this choice. Now, we might find a
>> different way of giving the choice against cold-boot attacks without
>> degrading the experience for busy and distracted users.
> 
> (Assuming we have the default behaviour I've described above, which
> avoids degrading the experience for busy and distracted users.)
> 
> It may be nice to provide a way to somehow tell Tails "I'm going to
> close the lid but please don't suspend, because I want to keep the
> system up and able to trigger emergency shutdown if I unplug the Tails
> device". I see that as a new feature request with a tiny target user
> base, so to be honest, even if someone showed up and was ready to do
> the coding work, regrettably I suspect it would require more UX/design
> work and reviewing resources from us than it's worth, so I'm not sure
> how to handle this.

Agreed. I'm fine with mentioning this briefly on #11052 so we don't
forget if someone else raises this topic again in the future and don't
do anything else ourselves on it.

-- 
sajolida
_______________________________________________
Tails-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to