On 03/01/21 20:27, Zen Fu wrote: > Hi! > > intrigeri <[email protected]> writes: >> I've compared these 3 options on >> https://gitlab.tails.boum.org/tails/tails/-/issues/18079 > Thanks for the historic view and to all involved for the research. yes, thanks for share the process about Why and the comparison >> - non-wiki Git repository hosted on GitLab: >> >> - Lacks an easy way to attach files; this is one major use case for >> our blueprints >> - Lacks an easy way to create or rename a page
I added the description in the table in the issue. You need be in a directory, there is the + button to upload file and new page. browse in the page, with the blue button edit, you can rename the page that you created. >> >> So, my questions to you today are: >> >> - Do you agree that these are deal breakers? I'm not agree, but sure you have my consent for the migration. I think that also the gitlab markdown repo, not has an excellent navigation. And this could be a deal breaker for me. > >> - Is there a deal breaker that I missed for the "GitLab wiki" option? > Not that I see. I added a comment in the page issue page about usability of the navigation of gitlab wiki. https://gitlab.tails.boum.org/tails/tails/-/issues/18079#note_163274 but is only to inform you/us, I don't want that we change strategy. only that recognize that could be exist this problem. I have not solution for this now, only using gitlab. So every other strategy is... too long! hugs ignifugo > _______________________________________________ > Tails-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev > To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to > [email protected].
_______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.autistici.org/mailman/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
