L.R. D.S. wrote (05 Mar 2015 12:42:20 GMT) : >>Where exactly are we claiming that?
> Sorry, I don't understand your question. We're trying hard not to convey the vision that computer security is a binary thing, and I don't remember that we've ever written anywhere that Tails is "secure". You wrote that we were claiming that Tails is secure, or similar (I don't have the original email anymore, sorry), so I'm curious where you found this claim... mainly because I'd like to correct it. That was all :) > I did two simple questions: > - Why Tails OS deliberately put the main ISO image in a non encrypted > vulnerable traffic (http), since all the site is encrypted with TLS? The ISO images are distributed via a pool of mirrors that we don't manage ourselves. We have no means to assert how much we trust the people who run these mirrors. So adding TLS would not guarantee much. Still, we're (slowly) working on adding TLS support for our pool of mirrors, as a (lightweight and weak) protection against network attackers. > - What other methods to download this image we have? https://tails.boum.org/download/ Cheers! _______________________________________________ tails-support mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-support To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
