Thank you, intrigeri!!! Excuse me for my claim about lack of answer!!! I'm NOT computer's science Frick and even not the experienced user of the PC - the using by torcc tuning is the EXTRAORDINARY effort for me - and the understanding of the issue protocol is so far from the borders of my capabilities... So - EXCUSE me, PLEASE, for my claim for the lack of your answer, PLEASE! And THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your effort to be large with me despite of my false (arrogation)! Excuse my English, please!
In case you can see my features requests as legaly - despite of my unfounded claim - transfer these pleas and questions to the appropriate teams, please! THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND EXCUSE ME, PLEASE! Sincerely On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:21 AM, intrigeri <[email protected]> wrote: > Ilia Alexeev: > > This my question about a workaround for the lack of my ability to tune > the > > torcc file was NOT answered in YOUR reply > > On January 1st, in > https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-testers/2017-January/000564.html > I've pointed you to the ticket (#12000) where workarounds are listed. >
_______________________________________________ tails-support mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-support To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
