Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/>
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Cameron <[email protected]>wrote: > Franc, > > Which Creative Commons license is the ABS data licensed under? Only some of > them are compatible with OSM's CC-BY-SA 2.0. > > ~Cameron > > 2009/2/19 Franc Carter <[email protected]> > >> >> Hi, >> >> It looks like the vote is in favour of relations and there is the >> beginnings of consensus around other tags. >> >> So I have updated the wiki page at >> >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ABS_Data#Australian_Bureau_of_Statistics >> >> At the moment the wiki says tagging will only go on relations - but >> thought and investigations are >> still needed on this:- >> >> * Does the ABS require attribution on the nodes and ways - these have >> been heavily butchered >> from the original shape files. Whereas the relations bare a reasonable >> semblence to the shape >> files they were sourced from >> >> * I have been thinking about future updates - I think it's going to be >> ugly to do anything other than diff >> the shape files from this import and the next. Again, because of the >> amount of mangling that has >> gone in to the import I don't think carrying the identifiers across to >> OSM makes much sense other >> than for the relations. >> >> Have a read and let me know thoughts/objections. Once we have the wiki >> page in reasonable >> shape I'll ask for feedback from the main osm list >> >> cheers >> >> -- >> Franc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >> > -- Franc
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
