Hi all, It's really nice to see suburb boundaries popping up around the place, it just makes the map look that little bit more professional.
There seems to be some naming redundancy in the NSW data though. The previous nswgnb import (before my time, don't know the source or history of this) placed suburb names all around the place, and now the ABS suburb import is repeating the data. An example of this is here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-32.96227&lon=151.65078&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF What are people's thoughts about this? Should the data be sanity checked for naming consistency then the nswgnb node deleted? Or should it be kept incase some renderer doesn't understand the suburb relation? Like perhaps it would be easier for the mkgmap devs to keep the nodes rather than have them write code to make a node from the relation. Thoughts? Brent (Biogenesis_)
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
