--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Nick Black <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Nick Black <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Status of the Local Chapter working group > To: "Jochen Topf" <[email protected]> > Cc: "OSM talk" <[email protected]>, "Nick Black" <[email protected]>, > "Michael Kugelmann" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 12 August, 2009, 10:56 AM > Ok, taken out the OSM-F list. Thanks for > updating the wiki - I'm going to take a look over it > tomorrow and make sure all the info the community needs is > on there. From there I will propose a set of steps towards > getting Local Chapters set up, along with any remaining > questions. The community will be able to comment on the > process and see what is going on and what needs to be done > to set up local chapters. > > --Nick > > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:58 AM, > Jochen Topf <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Lets use the mailing lists and the wiki. Thats much more > inclusive for a > > diverse group like this. Especially for this issue where > there are people > > from many countries in different time zones involved and > where many will > > not speak English well enough to feel comfortable voicing > their opinions > > in a phone call. And as a bonus everything is already > documented for > > eveybody else and we don't need to wait for meeting > minutes etc. > > > > Jochen > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:30:06AM +0200, Nick Black > wrote: > > > Cc: Michael Kugelmann <[email protected]>, > [email protected], > > > OSM talk <[email protected]> > > > From: Nick Black <[email protected]> > > > To: Jochen Topf <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk] Status of the > Local Chapter working group > > > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:30:06 +0200 > > > > > > Hi Jochen, > > > > > > Thanks for updating the page. We should try and pick > things up again > > > regarding Local Chapters, especially after the > progress we made at SOTM. > > > > > > How about we set up a call for late next week or early > the week after > > > with all of the interested parties? I'm out of > the office today, but if > > > this sounds good I'll get it set up tomorrow. > > > > > > (BTW - Agree wrt using OSM-Talk, but I don't have > access to my osm-talk > > > email account when I'm offline). > > > > > > -- > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > On 9 Aug 2009, at 19:45, Jochen Topf wrote: > > > > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Michael > Kugelmann wrote: > > >>> looking at the foundation web site and the > wiki, there is very few > > >>> information on the local chapter working group > - only a draft of the > > >>> federation agreement is linked withought an > information on the > > >>> version > > >>> or date it was created! Additionally there are > no meeting minutes > > >>> available at all. (or at least I didn't > find iformation and minutes). > > >>> On the Saturday eving at the SOTM09 there was > a meeting relatetd to > > >>> to > > >>> local chapters. > > >>> > > >>> So please could: > > >>> A) somebody from the working group give the > current status (and maybe > > >>> add a version information to the draft!) > > >>> B) somebody joining the SOTM meeting provide > information what was > > >>> discussed and potential results > > >>> C) somebody from the working group providing > information on next > > >>> steps... > > >> > > >> I am not a member of the working group, but to get > the ball rolling > > >> again > > >> I have brought the wiki page at > > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters > up to > > >> date > > >> and added all the stuff that I remember from our > meeting at SOTM. > > >> > > >> I have tried to bring in all the issues that were > raised in a form > > >> that > > >> they can be discussed easily. I think the creation > of a legal document > > >> as the formal agreement between OSMF and a local > chapter is only the > > >> second > > >> step. The first is that we as a community have to > agree roughly on how > > >> the relationship between OSMF and the local > chapters should be shaped > > >> and > > >> how they fit into the larger context of the OSM > community and the > > >> other > > >> work of OSMF. > > >> > > >> Because this is probably an issue of interest to > more than current OSM > > >> members, I would encourage you to discuss things > on the talk list and > > >> on > > >> the wiki. > > >> > > >> Jochen > > >> -- > > >> Jochen Topf [email protected] > http://www.remote.org/jochen/ > > >> +49-721-388298 > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> osmf-talk mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk > > > > > > -- > > > Nick Black > > > twitter.com/nick_b > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jochen Topf [email protected] > http://www.remote.org/jochen/ > +49-721-388298 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > > -- > -- > Nick Black > twitter.com/nick_b > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
