On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, James Livingston wrote: > Hi all, > > While looking at the wiki page describing the highway tag[0] recently, > I noticed that the Australian entry in "International Equivalence" > doesn't match what is on the Australian Tagging Guidelines page, and > what actually gets mapped. > > For example it says that in states with MABC classifications, A should > be primary not trunk, and B should be secondary not primary, and so > on. I'm not sure if the other bits in the entry are correct, such as > which are "state maintained" and so on, so I haven't changed anything > yet. Does anyone know which of the other bits are correct and which > aren't? > > > [0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway > > _______________________________________________
I'll stick my neck out and say that International Equivalence is wrong to be particular "National highways; state strategic road network. Connecting major population centres. For example Bruce Highway, Pacific Highway." the example of the Bruce Highway shows the error - the Bruce Highway carries the A1 marker where it is not M1 http://www.ozroads.com.au/QLD/routenumbering/alpha/alpharoutes.htm I used to get incredibly confused with primary = b and secondary = c but this list got me better understanding the classification _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
