John Smith-129 wrote: > > This is the current relation tags I've come up with based on the talk-us > threads. > > Ref Relation tags: > > addr:country=Australia > addr:state=QLD > network=A > ref=1 > route=road > type=route > > Name Relation tags: > name=Bruce Highway > route=road > type=route >
Nice work John, looks great. A few questions: 1. I presume the addr:country=Australia is manditory for this to work, but :state optional? I could imagine only needing state for state specific sheilds (ie. nationally consistent ones wouldn't need state). 2. If a Route has the same ref/name for it's length, there doesn't seem to be any problem with having just one relation, combining the tags. I think this would make simple cases simple to map (always a good thing). 3. I think you suggested if there is no underlying street name for a section of highway, copy/move the name from the relation to the way, is that right? I'd prefer the other way, where the name is stored in the relation so a lot of the ways would have no name (the validators/no-names maps would need to be updated to grab data from relations if they don't already do. I think this would be a nice clean solution, and matches the suggestion ages ago to put a street name in a relation when it is broken up by many residential roundabouts... BlueMM (checking how posting from Nabble.com works compared to Gmane.org, which has broken posting at the moment) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I%27ve-been-trying-to-fix-the-highway-shields-and-came-across-this....-tp24970890p25000891.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Australian Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
