Talking about the appropriate attribution,
The http://data.australia.gov.au/152 webpage indicates the citation as "Queensland Department of Environment and Resource Management". This is incorrect and DERM is actually chasing up the website editor to get things changed. (Trust a "gov2.0" initiative to respond at web 1.0 speeds.) Just to confirm, the correct minimum attribution is "State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2009" for the following datasets: Property Boundaries Annual Extract Queensland (Lite DCDB) Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/152 Local Government Boundaries Annual Extract Queensland Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/157 Surface Water Gauging Stations Queensland Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/148 Groundwater Observation Bore Sites Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/142 Drainage Basins Queensland Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/134 Queensland Wetlands Mapping Estates Layer including National Parks, Conservation Areas & Forest Reserves Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/127 Queensland Wetlands Data Wetlands Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/119 Queensland Wetlands Mapping Streams Original dataset home page: http://data.australia.gov.au/97 or http://data.australia.gov.au/114 There might be an equivalent problem with the other state and territory datasets but I would need to hase up to confirm. Thanks, Brendan (morb_au) On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:58:15 +1000, Ross Scanlon wrote: >On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:46:22 +1000 >John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/10/3 Ross Scanlon <[email protected]>: >> > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:29:13 +1000 >> > John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> 2009/10/3 John Smith <[email protected]>: >> >> > Using the Qld govt boundaries information it's possible to work out >> >> > where streets are, although some streets have been consumed and the >> >> > boundary information doesn't reflect this. >> >> > >> >> > Does anyone know how roads drawn from this information should be tagged? >> >> > >> >> >> >> I plotted out the missing streets in Maleny, Qld, as a test case to >> >> figure the attributation tags out: >> >> >> >> http://maps.bigtincan.com/?z=16&ll=-26.761,152.849&layer=B00000000FF >> >> >> >> I've left everything as highway=road so I can easily work out what I did. >> > >> > Looks good. >> > >> > Leaving it as highway=road also gives the rest of us an indication that >> > more needs to be added, way type, name, etc. >> >> I intended to fix it as soon as I could work out what tags were >> needed, but I thought I'd give an example of what is possible thanks >> to the new data becoming available. >> >The tags here: >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data.australia.gov.au/Queensland >Look appropriate for the attribution and source. >I'd probably leave them as highway=road as above. >-- >Cheers >Ross >_______________________________________________ >Talk-au mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
