On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Steve Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > > One question, though, for "Australian shared path", shouldn't this be: > > > > highway=cycleway, bicycle=designated, foot=designated > > > > rather than > > > > highway=footway, foot=yes, bicycle=yes > > I've updated the wiki page to this. I think we need to look further > than the legal definitions because, for a start, they're barely > comprehensible. I still don't really get what an "Australian bicycle > path" would cover. > > My suggestions. Tag all the following "cycleway": > - all shared use paths > - all paths with a bicycle sign anywhere on them > - all sealed footpaths that have names (ie, in local council > documentation, like "xxx trail") > - all rail trails > - any sealed path that cars aren't allowed on and that is longer than > one kilometre, and that doesn't have an explicit prohibition on bikes. >
I'm thinking that a cycleway is a place *designed* to ride bikes but i haven't got enough information to put together a decent argument there is one yank with a very literal interpretation of everything on the main tagging list who has trouble comprehending so i need better argument and underlying facts _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
