2009/12/28 Liz <[email protected]>: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Matija Nalis <[email protected]> > To: Matt Amos <[email protected]> > > I would actually expect OSMF membership to be *more* interested in the > license change issues than the average OSM contributor; but even if we > assume that it is representative of the general OSM population, it is > terrible !
I wonder what numbers are needed if they wanted to change the organisation constitution, you usually need a 2/3'rds majority by default in Australia, something they don't seem to have achieved. > "We should proceed with change of license only if that would result in: This is the problem with polls in general, they are only as valuable as the person writing them, or more to the point how biasly they are writing them. > Opinions above are GNU-copylefted. This is funny, since he would have been better off with a cc-by copyright license in this instance :) Also something no one seems to have answered, if cc-by-sa isn't valid on geodata then no data has to be deleted, it could be simply taken and re-licensed, or what am I missing here? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
