2009/12/30 Craig Feuerherdt <[email protected]>: > The same thing happens here as well John. > So you are saying that specific playgrounds etc are AFZ's as well. So in > those instances they would be part of a relation (with a single object ie > the polygon representing the playground). > I think relations are the best option for AFZ's because they allow > flexibility to cover both scenarios. It is therefore easier for renders to > look at just relations when it comes to rendering them rather than tags and > relations.
Perhaps relations would be good enough if you can map landuse areas, but in rural areas it's hard to map landuses, most parks are rough guesses. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
