2010/1/1 Steve Bennett <[email protected]>: > No, if you constantly repeat yourself on a mailing list, it's *everybody*'s > problem. Everyone here understands that renderers can filter out > information. Just like I could reply to every message and say "Different > people tag in different ways, and that's ok!" It doesn't advance anyone's > understanding – it's just noise.
Maybe you should ask better questions if you want better answers then. > Whereas this: >>Or to put it another way, why are you trying to limit what gets >>rendered by limiting what gets mapped? > > ...is purely inflammatory. As if I ever suggested "limiting" anything. And also accurate... You are suggesting we limit what is mapped, regardless of the reason, to achieve your desired outcome. > Once and for all: My position is that mapping manpower is limited. In an Which is assuming everyone mapping is interested in mapping the same thing you are, what about someone that only cares about trains, are you going to tell them to drop everything and just map roads? > that I'm trying to "limit" the project in some way. In other words you are trying to limit what is mapped to match your ideals of what a map should be... > Now, are you willing to agree to this principle, so we can move on, or are How can I make an agreement for everyone, simply put what a map is to me is completely different to what a map is to someone else, what interests me is completely different to what interests other people, if people want to map houses why tell them they can't? > you going to continue to accuse me of being too thick to understand how a > renderer works, or of trying to curtail the scope of OSM every time I make > any suggestion? You seem to have a fairly closed imagination... If you don't dream of what's possible, it never will be... _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
