On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:51 AM, John Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > One route I'm thinking about is the Bicentennial National Trail. > > http://www.nationaltrail.com.au/ > > Many signs have disappeared. But some of is mapped in google (where > it's given as the road name): > > http://tinyurl.com/ya8bsvy > > > Yeah, that's a curious one. I have some topo maps where it's marked in some places (nearish Healesville), then it disappears again. Personally, I'd mark it, but try not to be too "systematic" about it. Heh. It's a pretty dumb situation really. I sort of think...why is map of a route in a book copyright, if the route itself isn't? Or to put it differently, why isn't the physical trail copyright? It's just the same information as in the book, only thousands of times larger. Steve
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
