On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Craig Feuerherdt <[email protected]>wrote:
> I believe the Australian guidelines have been derived from international > guidelines. The "natural=" and "landuse=" tags are confusing on the wiki as > they switch between land use and land cover (as defined above). It would be > good to document the Australian definition of the current tags so we get > some consistency. I am happy to start something if others wish to > contribute. > > For the purpose of OSM I believe land use and land cover are the 2 > important things. (Not too fussed with land cover at this stage, more > interested in defining the boundary of the parks). I am happy to attribute > polygons as generic administrative boundaries for the moment as we can > always come back and attribute them as National, State etc parks later. > That all looks pretty sensible, though not sure whether "land management" concerns us. Please do set up a list in the wiki giving some suggested tags that we can argue over. Steve
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
