2010/1/13 Roy Wallace <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> In this case you have to assume the turn restictions are completely
>> ignored, which if that is the case is there really any point in
>> putting them in in the first place to tell stupid things how to do
>> their jobs better when the programming should be improved?
>
> "Improved" how?
>

Code is generated based on assumptions, so the assumptions need to be
improved and the code updated for the new assumptions.

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to