This is exactly right John, one of the pitfalls of mass importation of data (however given the state of the US TIGER data it is hardly surprising). For me it highlights the importance of ensuring that any data being imported is fit for purpose, does not already exist (even partially such as the Melbourne tram stops) in OSM and that the attributing is 'correct' or 'agreed' prior to importing. The exact reason for discussing any data import through these lists.
On 11 February 2010 13:01, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 February 2010 11:44, Craig Feuerherdt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am not going to start on the USA duplicate removal, there is some > definite > > time & effort required there :) > > If you look at the countries with the most duplicates these tend to > have had imports. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
