Hi all, The Aus tagging guidelines suggest using "highway=path foot=yes": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
But surely "foot=designated" is the correct tag, particularly for tracks which explicitly ban every other mode of transport. However I should point out that "highway=path foot=designated" is (according to mapnik at least) equivalent to "highway=footway" which it says not to use... Also, we don't seem to have any guidelines on the walking route networks, so I've started something here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Bush_Walking_and_Cycling_Tracks Not too important yet, but it would certainly be good to get all walking tracks using route relations, and to be roughly consistent about what is IWN/NWN/RWN/LWN. Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
