+1 nothing is ever perfect in everyones eyes, but I can live with it :) On 17 June 2010 15:19, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't disagree Roy. > >> I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these > >> peri-urban areas are a distinct land use. > >> > >> The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to) > distinguish > >> between types of landuse? > > > > You could always sub-type instead of a new type... > > > > landuse=residential > > residential=semi-rural > > +1. Although I don't really see that much information is added by > "residential=semi-rural", at least it stays out of the way :) >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
