On 12 August 2010 22:03, Liz <[email protected]> wrote: > I can immediately think of an edit which could fall into the above category, > and it would not be classified as "abusive" because it did add additional > information to the tags.
Not only that, but others on the talk-au list at the time thought it was a good idea and added value, I don't recall anyone asking for a revert, and others had made similar changes in the past, but on a smaller scale, it was those changes that actually gave me the idea to do it anyway. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
