On 14 August 2010 18:19, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > This sounds right to me. But if you propose bridge:ref=* then you > should probably also use bridge:name=* rather than the already > proposed bridge_name=*.
I still think it should be just name=*, after all what's the point of the road name being rendered when you expect the bridge name to be? If you want to do name/ref for the way this is when you need to think about route relations, in which case you only need the bridge to be tagged with ref=* _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
