On 25 October 2010 10:01, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So effectivly in my view swanilli has deleated the bays I originally > added as nodes, and then put them back in as new nodes with a > different ID, while at the same time removing some of the tags I > originally had without providing any alternatives to thouse source > tags. > > Clearly done the wrong thing, IMO. I think there is still room to assume good faith. I know that I sometimes don't catch up the mailing lists or OSM messages for months at a time. I find putting the information and reasoning in the tags works well for communication. Information in the notes, or even in notes:FOR_SWANILLI. It also lets others editing in the area know what is going on. Ian.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
