On 5 November 2010 11:33, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Like putting a way down the middle of each lane and then tieing that
> back to the road, or like just adding a lane:n:feature = value to the
> existing road way? Then you could do something like lane:0:restriction
> = rightturnonly.

There is lots of things that can effect different lanes differently,
eg going under a bridge that angles upwards on one side with have
greater clearance on one side compared to the other. Some places have
diff maxspeed depending on which lane, etc etc etc.

>> At this stage the best solution I know of for joining the same
>> sections of road together is to use a route relation, this is useful
>> for when the road number and road name split, eg Bruce Highway is M1
>> and then it becomes the A1, but the M1 is also the Gateway Motorway
>> and the Pacific Highway etc etc etc...
>
> That might be good for those cases, but I was thinking on a smaller
> scale where you have a 50m road that for the first 20m has maxspeed 20
> and the last 80m as maxspeed 30. This doesn't really seem like a
> "route" to me. Becides the point I was trying to make was anything can

I could go into a rhetorical discussion about what a route is, but bus
routes occur on small residential streets etc, so a route is just a
way that has common segments. In this case you'd tag the name and any
ref against the route relation and tag any variations between segments
against the segments of way.

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to