On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 18:43 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I think that this > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6545161 should be > reverted on the grounds that my source tags were deleted with no > better replacement...
> Previously I asked this user directly about data that appeared very > much like that from Google Maps, they said they may have copied > directly from a Google Map... If you check the history of the original node, youll see that it came from ABS data. Was there a reason you deleted the original ABS data, and replaced it? The original element was tagged as natural=coastline, the one you added, removes natural=coastline in-favour of place=locality. Did you check when you deleted the natural=coastline way from ABS data, and replaced it with your source-tagged way, that it didnt break the coastline data? Maybe the revert from this user was correct. I also notice the node you added with the source tag, was not part of the Sydney Harbour National Park relation, which the original node was. I think theres been a bit of data-tampering on both sides here, so it would be good to get both sides of the story to know who did what and why. Cheers David _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
