For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.03275&lon=151.13694&zoom=17&layers=M
Along the edge of the bay/water there is land--> | <--trees in water--> | <-- water A B C In the changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6723657 I moved the edge of the water (which did cover both B and C) in towards the center of the bay, and made section B marsh. But I'm not sure if that was the right thing to do. Maybe it would be better if the natural=bay/water area included both B and C, and the boundary for B just laid on top of the B/C area. But since we use a proper mulitpolygon for doughnut geometries, just dumping B on top wouldn't look so nice.... What if B was tagged as marsh, C as water, and then add B and C to a multipolygon tagged as the bay? Or is how its mapped currently how it should be? Any thoughts? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
