On 20 January 2011 08:59, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we're being overly precious about the quality of the ABS > imports. In many cases they're clearly meant to follow a geographical > feature, but don't do it particularly well when overlaid on the OSM > data. That makes it look like there is some deliberate distinction > between the boundary and the underlying geographical form, when in > fact there isn't.
Once upon a time, it was the main source of reasonable data for areas not covered by Yahoo, I'm sure there is a lot of areas that don't have aerial imagery available still that it is the best source of data. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
