On 20 January 2011 15:47, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote: > In the email that I responded to (and which you in turn responded to > me), there was a list of 5 options. > > Option 1 was to leave admin boundaries unchanged, and not align them > (even as separate ways) to the coastline data, i.e they would > cross-cross the coastline as we improved the coastline accuracy. As > far as I recall, each of the responses to these options nominated > option 1 as preferred. I interpret that as support for leaving the > ABS imported data detached and unchanged, seeing there were other > options in the list for detached and aligned.
You of all people should know that vocal people on the mailing list don't constitute a majority vote. >> the original email of this thread was >> about a duplicate boundary being added from another data source and >> the person importing didn't bother to merge the information properly, >> or co-ordinate their efforts with the rest of the community. > > I know that, but that was no longer the topic of discussion when I > entered the thread. Unless the original issue has been rectified I'm guessing it's still an issue that needs to be dealt with. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
