On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:55 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:58:04 +1000 > John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 26 January 2011 09:21, David Murn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Upon doing a bit of research, the exact meaning varies depending on > > > where you are. In [1]New York for example, a BYO establishment MUST > > > have a liquor license. In [2]Victoria, a BYO license (actually a > > > permit) is for places that dont have a liquor license. > > > > So what was your conclusion? > > > Drink more or less?
I think the patriotic thing to do would be to visit some more licenced premises before I reach a conclusion. However, I think that given the differences abound in different regions, Steve's suggestion of a binary yes/no for both licenced and byo would be the best option unless any further complications arise (eg, BYO beer or wine). Steves suggested: licenced=yes/no byo=yes/no The only issue I would have, is with the spelling of licence. Steve suggested licensed but as OSM is traditionally British English, shouldnt licenced=yes/no be used? taginfo shows licenced=yes has 2 usages where licensed=yes has 9, so its early enough to still rectify the discrepencies. David _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
