name:Furntree Gully; Furn tree Gully. Ie, name it both ways, with the popular spelling first. Just a suggestion, I personally think it should be "Furntree Gully".
On 3 February 2011 21:29, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Alex Lum <[email protected]> wrote: >> In any case, we should be mapping what's "on-the-ground" anyway, i.e. the >> station signage (unless this signage is contradictory in which case it may >> be required to use official records). > > I thought the policy – wherever it's written – was using whatever the > locals think it is. I'm wary of placing too much trust in signage, > because with bike paths in particular, that approach gets you nowhere > fast. But if there's an official operator (which there is), whatever > their website says sounds like a good start. > > We definitely shouldn't have a situation where one person swears blind > that "the real name" of something is xxx even though common sense > dictates that it's yyy. > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
