On 5 February 2011 21:35, Stephen Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5 February 2011 15:30, Andrew Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > For example, I've surveyed an awful lot of the > > Perth northern suburbs, but I started off by tracing Nearmap imagery. My > > understanding is that Nearmap haven't agreed to the new licensing but > They have no problem with the license, it's the CT's they have issue > with (which allows the license to change later). I don't know if > they've finalised them yet, though.
We don't have any issues with the CTs, it's just that they're not legally compatible with our licence, that requires you to distribute tracings from our PhotoMaps as CC-BY-SA (and our licence hasn't changed, and was originally designed to be compatible with OSM). Incidentally, even as of January 2011, I see that 1% of all the requests* to our site were referrered from www.openstreetmap.org. Without some detailed log analysis I can't see if they're likely to be Potlatch, but it does indicate that there are still people tracing. There are also several hundred thousand requests from JOSM. Regards Ben * That's 1% of a couple of billion... -- Ben Last Development Manager nearmap.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
