On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 21:53 +1000, John Smith wrote:
> On 8 May 2011 21:41, Nick Hocking <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As usual - non trolls are welcome to let me know if I've missed anything (or
> > made some mistakes).
>
> So people asking difficult, but honest questions are labelled trolls
> so you don't have to answer?
>
> All this looks like is vandalism and half baked edits that should be
> reverted as you aren't adding value to the map, if you continue to do
> so any one of several of us will start reverting all your change sets.
These current edits are of value to OSM, newly developed roads in
developing suburbs ('some of which already have people living on them').
The map looks a bit funny because what is mapped is all that is on the
ground currently. There are more roads planned which is obvious from
recent aerial imagery, even to the point of driveways being paved before
the roads however the roads are currently just dirt tracts at last view.
One comment I will make though, is that it appears from comparing your
edits with nearmap imagery of nov-2010, some new streets you mapped
continue on past the extent you mapped them. Did you consider mapping
the newer unopened streets with construction tags so theyre still
visible but unroutable?
New NearMap imagery was taken over the weekend in Canberra, so within a
week or two expect to see new high-res imagery of the new developing
suburbs and even more areas to map while our data is still of interest
to some.
David
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
