James; all I can say is that the paragraph in question was written by our General Counsel specifically to allow existing contributions to stay in place. I'm not a lawyer, so I can't comment on interpretation! Regards Ben
PS: TRS80? I'm old enough to have owned one when they were new.... :( On 16 June 2011 09:12, James Andrewartha <*trs80*@student.uwa.edu.au> wrote: > Sadly, that's not how I understand it - particularly the "terms in > place between OSM and the individual ... at the relevant time." bit > says to me that retrospective signing of the CTs to cover old > contributions isn't allowed. > > James Andrewartha > -- *Ben Last* *Development Manager, HyperWeb* [image: nearmap.com] <http://www.nearmap.com> *T:* +61 8 9321 9340 | *D:* +61 8 6140 7212 | *F:* +61 8 9321 6876 | *M:*+61 423 475 673 *W:* www.nearmap.com | *A:* Ground Floor, 66 Kings Park Road, West Perth WA 6005 [image: leave us a message on facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/nearmap> [image: follow us on twitter] <http://www.twitter.com/nearmap> [image: nearmap youtube channel] <http://www.youtube.com/nearmap> [image: linkedin]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/nearmap-pty-ltd> [image: Get your Free nearmap.com newsletter now!]<http://www.nearmap.com/nearmap/subscription>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
