On 6 July 2011 21:29, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> and also people who ticked the CTs who have used CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources in > the past who may want to keep this data and continue using these sources in > the future. > Indeed. Number 9 on the list is "QldProtectedAreas<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/QldProtectedAreas>", which I'd assume is an account created specifically to upload CC-BY data, is marked as having accepted the CTs. > So, active Australian OSM contributors, are you staying with the OSM db? If > so how are you going to do edits going forward, because any CC-BY-SA derived > data you add may be removed if OSM abandons CC-BY-SA at some point in the > future (or may even be conflicting with your agreed CTs now...). > > Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to > merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping. Do you have > any concerns over the switch? > > Are you going to stop contributing data altogether? Or are you putting you > efforts on hold at the moment. > I've not been mapping very much recently, mostly waiting to see how the whole things plays out (apart from a few posts here and on legal-talk). -- James
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
