Nick Hocking <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got to disagree here. In my opinoion, Liz and John S (and a couple of > others) have, for quite awhile now had a clear agenda of just trying to damage > OSM as much as humanly possible.
Disagreement with what's currently being done or with what is proposed is not the same as trying to destroy the project. > On this basis, I believe that the best thing would be for there to be no posts > from these people on these lists. Stifling dissent so you only hear agreeable opinons might make you feel good but it's counter-productive. The productive approach is to actually address the issues and dissenting opinions. Yes it's more difficult that way, but it's the only way to improve. -- Sam Couter | mailto:[email protected] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
