The nodes would be fine if not from a ct-declining contributor. If not
then they need to be replaced.
Cheers
Ross
On 23/12/11 14:31, Ben Johnson wrote:
Thanks Ben that's a great idea. I'll keep whatever nodes I can and
extrapolate from there.
I really didn't want this raising old wounds, nor do I want people
dwelling on it. I was just letting the community know that someone (i.e.
me) is working on this particular piece of infrastructure, so that
hopefully others will start rebuilding other stuff. There are plenty of
things needing attention.
Does it make sense to come up with a priority list of targets to remap?
I'm thinking coastlines, lakes, islands, waterways, major road, rail, etc..
I reckon most "Joe-Blow" contributors in Australia are blissfully
unaware of the various license inspector tools available and the actions
needed to be taken. How do we wake them up?
BJ
On 23/12/2011, at 9:56 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
Hi.
Many rail lines in Sydney would be traced from nearmap. Unless you
have a survey grade GPS the existing points are probably more
accurate. We can keep points mapped from nearmap even if we recreate
the ways. (I haven't checked to see if the nodes are CT-OK - hoping
they are. )
- Ben.
Ben Kelley
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
