On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok so if your mapping every 10m and the first 10m is 2wd and then the next > is 4wd the remainder of the track becomes 4wd_only.
What about coming from the other end? On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:27 AM, David Findlay <[email protected]> wrote: > So for instance I've just added a track in Freshwater National Park. It's > designated as a walking trail, but is really a 4wd track with a gate at the > end. So I've added it as a Track, but tagged no motorcycle or motorcar, but > said foot and bicycle yes. Sounds correct? In another area the tracks are > often again wide enough for 4wd's, but fences prevent vehicular access so I've > made them paths? Thanks, For the first one, yes how I would do it; for the second I would still tag it as a track, and as Michael pointed out use barrier=gate with the restrictions on the gate. On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > Read the wiki: > > "Description: > > A road signed as only suitable for 4WD Only vehicles" > > > If it's not signposted as 4wd only and "I don't think a 2WD can drive here" > then it's 4wd=recommended. Yes, I should really have read the wiki. It makes sense now, use 4wd_only=yes only where it is signposted or otherwise legally restricted to 4wd only, irrespective of the actual surface, and 4wd_only=recommended for the latter case. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
