Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, there's no question whatsoever that "I" (meaning OSMF) have > behaved like a complete dick. Now, do we continue this game of "well, > you behaved like a dick, so I'm going to behave like a dick", or do we > take the higher moral ground of "well, you behaved like a dick, but I > joined this project for the good of the greater community, and I'm not > going to let my hurt feelings get in the way of that".
This is a false dichotomy. There is at least one more perspective: "you" (meaning OSMF and OSM contributors) suck it up and deal with the consequences of your actions. What's happening now was predicted way back, and I know "I told you so" doesn't actually help anybody, but it does mean it's unreasonable for you to act all surprised and offended about what's going on. There's really no point in either side whinging because I don't think anything is going to change. > What's more important - the ideological dispute with OSMF, or building > an awesome map database? I don't think it's that simple. If it were I'd contribute corrections and such to Google's maps. -- Sam Couter | mailto:[email protected] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
