I'll scream about tomorrow lunchtime. Can you explain why the DWG need to be involved here?
I'm not sure I see the benefits of a bulk remove prior to everything else. I have had no difficulties in removing the ABS boundaries when they get it my way. Ian. On Feb 1, 2012 11:50 PM, "Nick Hocking" <nick.hock...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark wrote > > "I think leave in the broken ones for now." > > The only problem some may have is that once a relation > is empty you won't be able to locate it again although it > will disappear on April 1st. > > Still if people have added roads into the boundary relation > then the road won't be deleted and therefore the relation > will not be empty. > > So yes I agree lets just get the version 1 ABS boundaries > deleted and let the relations look after themselves. > > Tomorrow lunchtime I will ask DWG to do the deletes, > unless there are lots of screams here. > > If there are lots of screams here next week then we could, > of course get the deletes reverted. > > And yes, I will produce a list of 1500 boundary roads > and 1500boundary waterways which are at risk. > (this weekend I promise). > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
