On Fri, July 20, 2012 2:19 pm, Steve Bennett wrote: > Also, FWIW, the Bing imagery is generally great - I've certainly not > seen anything like a 100m discrepancy. Wherever I have a GPS trace, > it's always aligned very well with the Bing imagery. IMHO (possibly in > the minority) even mapping based on misaligned imagery isn't a major > problem. What's worse - a town that is perfectly mapped but 100m, or > the same town not mapped at all?
I agree. Over here in WA we've got buckets of GPS traces, all over the place, and they're usually pretty much spot-on with Bing. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
