I emailed the Bike Marrickville list, and the consensus seems to be to keep them where they are signposted.
Still waiting on a response from someone on the council as to what their future strategy on signage is. I have seen internal documents using these references, as well as RRxx for regional routes (which don't appear on signs). It's been so long since I surveyed these that I'm not sure how much help I can give. I am pretty sure these have signs: L2 (although possibly confused with L5 in places), L4, L5 (with alternate sections where I used L5a), L7, L10, L11 and L13. Arguably a lot of L8 has no signs at all. - Ben. On Jul 31, 2012 12:12 PM, "Sam Russell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian wrote, > > On the subject of Marrickville cycle routes, I know they were one of the > > only councils in Sydney with nicely numbered routes from point to point. > > However, the route numbers have gone off their web page. The few route > > numbers that remain around the LGA are in disrepair, and most have gone. > > > Do we want to remap Marrickville using what I think is now an outdated > > route numbering scheme, or bring the mapping inline with the rest of > Sydney. > > Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear > intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name. > Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#? > > My Saturday ride is unplanned right now, I'm happy to go chasing routing > and route identity signs in Marrickville. > > yours, > Sam R. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
