When there is only a bike logo painted on the road I generally just use lcn=yes (or apply an equivalent relation).
Contrary to the Wikipedia article, you can always use the whole lane regardless of the marking. (Except when there is a b&w bike lane sign.) I don't think these road markings warrant a cycleway= tag. - Ben Kelley. On Aug 1, 2012 12:03 PM, "Sam Russell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Ian, > > In contrast to: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319564 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319563 > and > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2319565 > > which are continuously marked with the blue route marker, my previous > experience of L8/L13 in Marrickville indicates that marking will be > sporadic (and therefore "fun"). > > It would be great if someone knew the AS1742 code for the outdated blue > bicycle route markers, because key:traffic_sign follows the format: > > key:traffic_sign=AU:AS1742.1-YEAR:Code > > In the meantime I'm happy to code them: > > key:traffic_sign=AU:blue bike route > > * * * > > As another bicycle related question, could other mappers opine on bicycle > advisory road markings, in particular could we discuss the following points: > > Bicycle advisory road markings in the centres of lanes ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_lane_marking) > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/23392343 (Between Elizabeth > and Regent) > I would propose we treat these as infrastructure with cycleway = shared or > cycleway = sharrow > Users at sydneycyclist appear to value the effect of these of vehicle > behaviour. > > Bicycle advisory road markings in the door zone, or under parked cars > I would propose we ignore these as infrastructure, and only attend to them > as proof of "map only" lcns where the marking is consistent over the > council's mapped route > > opinions? > > yours, > Sam R. > > On 1 August 2012 10:02, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 31 July 2012 11:49, Sam Russell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Where route numbers are in repair or in repair but separated by clear >>> intervening route signs, keep the route ref and name. >>> Where route numbers are in disrepair copy key:ref=L# to key:old_ref=L#? >>> >>> My Saturday ride is unplanned right now, I'm happy to go chasing routing >>> and route identity signs in Marrickville. >>> >> >> If you decide to go, by all means map the location of any signs you find >> with key=traffic_sign. >> >> My feeling is that following any of the numbered routes by means of >> following the equivalent signs isn't doable any longer. >> >> Otherwise, I'll be interested to see if Ben gets a response from the >> council. >> >> Ian. >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
