On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Ian Sergeant <[email protected]> wrote:
> Generally the case, but not always. My bicycle sign on Parramatta road > being my best example so I'm sticking with it. A cycle route down a narrow > three lane road, carrying trucks who'd soon as take you out as look at > you.... > > Well, I guess I'm focussed on being alive when I get to B. > > These use cases are handled by routing software making good use of data such as cycleway=lane. Using the lcn/rcn tagging system to mark safety/suitability is simply incorrect. In your example, there's a signed bicycle route - so we map it. To do otherwise would be like not mapping a car park because we don't think people should park there, or not mapping a school because we don't think it's a good one. Steve
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
