On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, James Livingston <[email protected]> wrote: > If in future we want to map both the low and high water marks, the > obvious thing to do would be to use coastline for the low water mark, > water=tidal[0] for the middle area, and beach/whatever for everything > that's dry.
If you do it that way, then I think that would be fine. But I drastic switch of natural=coastline to low tide mark is going to be throught with problems, so another tag would be needed. I still consider that tidal area part of the named beach, so it would be nice to attach the name to it too. But in the end, I don't think it really matters. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
