On 2013-08-20 12:30, Ian Sergeant wrote:
> On 20 August 2013 18:29, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Did they confirm with Geoscience that the "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 >> Australia" is compatible with ODBL? >> >> This is one of the reservations that some of us had with changing to ODBL. > > Maybe. The issue for both licences is just getting the attribution right. I > think you've taken the view that just an attribution in the data is > sufficient, and nothing on the map itself? I think it is best in both cases > just to agree with the data owner what constitutes reasonable attribution for > the medium, and that we can deliver it. Ref CC-BY-SA3 - it seems to be fairly explicit on these pages: * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Australia * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/data.gov.au_explicit_permission I think the attribution should not go on the source tags of the nodes/ways, but instead on the changeset and the wiki. Chris
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
