Jason, My apologies for not getting back to you sooner. We went ahead and gave the user a temporary block two days ago. It doesn't look like he's bothered to log in since.
You mentioned that you and other have rolled back some of his edits. Do you want to continue to do so (since you seem to be coordinating) or should I? - Serge On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Jason Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi DWG (CC talk-au list), > > Below is a segment of a discussion on talk-au regarding edits made by > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/robbief14. > > He is unresponsive to messages sent via OSM and continues to add and > remove content that has been established as incorrect. I am notifying you > as users within the talk-au discussion have established some actions within > his edits to be vandalism (with some rollbacks by users being re-added back > in by this user). > > If you have any questions please contact the guys on the list and I > apologise if you have been notified separately to my comms (no-one was > nominated or volunteered so I just sent this message). > > Cheers, > > Jason > > > On 16 February 2014 08:31, Leon Kernan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, he seems to be putting back his fake roads again. Just as I finished >> fixing some of them from last time... >> >> Has anyone managed to contact him (I noticed several people in the >> talk-GB list were trying to) and is it time to get someone like the Data >> Working Group involved to deal with him? At the least, I believe every one >> of his edits in Australia is bogus. >> >> I've checked the following: >> He's reinstated the Shepparton bypass again. I can say with >> certainty that that road doesn't exist except in the road authorities >> future plans. >> There is also a Pacific Highway tunnel that's appeared in Sydney >> that I believe is still in the planning phase. >> >> The Adelaide northern connector is also in the planning phase (still >> not funded according to their website) and sure enough, he's made it >> complete. >> >> Look at this minor example: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261508781#map=19/-37.56324/143.93172 >> >> There is no justification for adding those ramps, which would be >> dangerous if they were actually built like that. >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:49 AM, SomeoneElse <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> There seem to be a lot of deletions in this and subsequent changesets: >>> >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20555081 >>> >>> Are they valid? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
