Someone probably got tangled up with the light rail at some point. I know there are occasions i've seen massive bridges where people forgot to split them at the end and it's quite easy to pick up the wrong relation at times.
You are correct that a normal rail line should be railway=rail. I'd double check what the other members of the relation are before changing it though. That segment might have been added to the wrong relation. On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > Found it .. it is in the route relation ! > > route=rail would be more appropriate? > rather than route=light_rail ? > > Don't know thence the question. > > > > -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 12 > Dec 2014 12:58:38 +1100 From: Warin <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; > rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: talk-au > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: Railway > in Sydney .. tagged light_rail Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="------------090801040101020004030307" > > Hi, > > I've noticed that the main north line railway line in Sydney is tagged > railway=light_rail .. that does not make sense to me. > > It is of the standard gauge for Australia and carries freight! .. so > should be tagged railway=rail? > > Ref http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Types_of_railway_line > > ----------------- > I'm not including lines of less than standard gauge, or those not capable > of carrying freight. Just the normal train lines in Sydney. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
