I've noticed the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14080990 where the user connected a bunch of highways/footways with the railway=station node and used the name "StreetToTransitConnection".
I've asked the user about this in the changeset comment but I've had no reply. First problem is, these are all named incorrectly as "StreetToTransitConnection". Secondly in some instances I've found the footway the user added was actually incorrect, went straight across the railway line where there was no footway in conflict with the existing footway network. In other cases the footway simply doesn't exist. I am curious if we need a footway to the actual station node? Normally you would have a footway to the platform and then that is enough, but maybe for routers we need a way to link the platfrom to a given station so that we don't need these incorrect footways linking them? Is a mass revert justified? Or do I need to go and do a mass removal of the "StreetToTransitConnection" name tag and fix up the ones I know about (which means there is no footway between the station node and the rest of the network)? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au