The correct tagging seems to be straight forward: tourism=alpine_hut indicates that there is a "Permanent human presence during the opening period from staff to provide services" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut).
tourism=wilderness_hut means that there are sleeping and cooking facilities (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut). amenity=shelter + shelter_type=basic_hut means no fireplace nor stove (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dbasic_hut). However, in Australia the standard appears to be: tourism=wilderness_hut + amenity=shelter + shelter_type=basic_hut There are only 17 basic huts that aren't also tagged wilderness_hut in Australia: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/avm On Saturday, 18 July 2015, 10:15, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: Thanks Warin for the reply. wilderness_hut should not cause map clutter because they should only be tagged in wilderness areas which by definition are largely empty of man made features but I accept that getting their zoom level changed may be difficult so continue to tag as basic hut in NSW and alpine hut in Victoria? Tony
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
