Thanks for letting us know. I checked out one particular changeset, 35907472, looking at the geometry changes at http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=35907472.
It appears like there is some missing data which they have added (which is great). But it also appears that they have removed finer details (which seem legitimate when comparing against the aerial imagery) of other existing geometry (which is bad, and in my opinion we need to revert back). I don't know what we should do about this since some parts of the changeset appear to be constructive some appear slightly destructive (no loss of features, just some slight loss of detail). On 13 December 2015 at 18:24, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo, > > It seems like some Australian mapper (stweb) [1] is reaching out for > help on the forum [2]. One of his complaints is the number of nodes > used to trace lakes, beaches, etc. He did several "simplifications" in > his last changesets [3]. I don't know how the Australian community > thinks about this. > > Perhaps it is worthwhile to reach out to him. > > > regards > > m > (from Belgium) > > > > > [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stweb > [2] http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=566043#p566043 > [3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stweb/history#map=6/-33.591/151.597 > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
